Tag Archive for 'Plagiarism'

Turnitin2 Beta Available

A beta version of Turnitin2 will be available to all users. Turnitin2-beta will provide instructors and administrators with an opportunity to familiarize themselves with Turnitin2. This should NOT be used for actual assignments or live classes as any work done in the beta version will not transfer to the live version on the 4th of September. A message with a link to the Turnitin2-beta site will appear when you log into Turnitin. All beta data will be removed after the 1st of  October.

Learn more about Turnitin2:

New Strategies to Reduce Plagiarism

Curriculum redesign as a faculty-centred approach to plagiarism reduction is research paper published by Sue Hrasky and David Kronenberg from the University of Tasmania, presented at the 4th International Plagiarism Conference in June 2010.

In it, they first look into two fundamental strategies on approaching plagiarism: proactively educate students on plagiarism, proper citation, and acceptable collaboration; and/or reactively catching and punishing instances of plagiarism. Both of these traditional approaches puts the onus of responsibility on the student. When an accusation of plagiarism occurs, the blame rests with the student rather than with the faculty or the institution.

Both methodologies work better together, but Hrasky and Kronenberg’s research is in search of identifying more holistic and proactive counter-plagiarism strategies that address aspects of curriculum design as a way to minimize plagiarism and share the responsibility for countering plagiarism across students, individual faculty, and the institution.

Download and read the entire paper or read the abstract

Hrasky, S. and Kronenberg, D. (2010). Curriculum redesign as a faculty-centred approach to plagiarism reduction. University of Tasmania. Retrieved from http://www.plagiarismadvice.org/conference/previous-plagiarism-conferences/4th-plagiarism-conference-2010.

Can Students “Trick” Turnitin?

Some students believe that they can “beat” Turnitin by employing various tactics. Instructors should rest assured that these tactics do not work as our algorithms take such “tricks” into account. In addition, the best practice for ensuring that students are not able to “beat the system” is to review all Originality Reports – regardless of the percentage shown as the Similarity Index. Instructors who look at the Originality Reports will be able to tell if something untoward has occurred.

What tricks do students try?

One trick is to replace a common character like “e” throughout the text of their paper with a foreign language character that looks like an “e” but is actually different (for example, a Cyrillic “e”). This method does not work because our algorithms replace such characters with the corresponding standard English character. The special character will still appear in the Originality Report; however, the word it is in will have been matched against words containing every character that looks like that character. This allows us to show you matches to words with both the special character and the standard character.

Another trick (touted by a video on the web) is to use Word Macros to disguise copied text. This method also does not work since Turnitin’s algorithms strip macros from Microsoft Word Documents for Word 2003 and below. When we strip a macro from a Word file, whatever character the student originally had in the file will appear. For instance, one of the videos recommends starting with a “~e” and replacing it with a standard “e” using macros. When we strip the macros the “~e” will appear in the paper. This means the “~e” will appear in the Originality Report, GradeMark, and the file available for you to download from the service. For Microsoft Word 2007, we don’t accept macros-enabled (.docm) files (we do accept the standard .docx files).

Another method consists of replacing all the spaces in a paper with invisible (white) text. This also does not work since Turnitin will not accept papers that appear to have this condition based on abnormal word lengths. In addition, the text-only Originality Report displays all text regardless of the color used by the student.

A fourth possible trick is to put quotation marks around the entire document. This does not work because Turnitin does not automatically exclude quoted material. Only the instructor can change the default setting to exclude quoted material from Originality Reports. The Originality Report would also show the quotation marks at the beginning and end of a paper in the same size text as the rest of the paper. If the instructor chooses to exclude quoted material, Turnitin displays a warning when a large percentage of a paper appears within quotation marks.

The Turnitin algorithms are updated on an on-going basis to make the Originality Reports more accurate and informative. As an instructor, your best defense is to ALWAYS review your students’ Originality Reports – even for Similarity Indexes shown as zero.  All of the “tricks” discussed here rely heavily on the idea that the instructor will not look at the Originality Report. All attempts to game the system become pretty obvious when the instructor examines the Originality Report. So make a quick scan of each Originality Report part of your standard practice when evaluating papers.

Cheating: A Gray Area

A new study from the University of Nebraska—Lincoln examines the prevalence and perceptions of cheating among high school students.

“Students generally understand what constitutes cheating, but they do it anyway,” said Kenneth Kiewra, professor of educational psychology at UNL and one of the authors of the study. “They cheat on tests, homework assignments and when writing reports. In some cases, though, students simply don’t grasp that some dishonest acts are cheating.”

Key findings of the study show:

  • 89 percent said glancing at someone else’s answers during a test was cheating, but 87 percent said they had done that at least once.
  • Sixty-two percent said doing individual take-home tests with a partner was cheating, but 51 percent said they’d done so.
  • 23 percent said doing individual homework with a partner was dishonest, but 91 percent had done so.

The results suggest that out-of-class misdeeds are viewed less harshly than in-class cheating, Kiewra said—a dynamic that is likely caused by teacher monitoring in class, and, therefore, a greater risk of getting caught. Read the press release here.

WHAT’S THE POINT?

The presence of Turnitin Originality Checking is a front line deterrent from cheating for many students. It reinforces the instructor’s and institution’s position on academic integrity, and at the very least, makes them try a little harder.

References:

Kiewra, Kenneth. (May 11, 2010). Most High Schoolers Cheat — But Don’t Always See It As Cheating. Retrieved May 12, 2010, from http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-05/uon-mhs051110.php .

Turnitin Newsletter – May 2010

View the original Turnitin Newsletter for May 2010

Effectiveness ChartTurnitin Works to Reduce Unoriginal Content and Plagiarism

Research results reveal that when secondary schools and higher education institutions use Turnitin® consistently and over a period of years, students become better writers and researchers—they create work with more original content and learn appropriate ways to use and cite source material. With continued use of Turnitin, educators can reinforce appropriate ways to use information year after year, across all disciplines.

Today’s educators are struggling to promote academic integrity at all levels as they develop tomorrow’s writers and researchers. Independent research studies reveal that student cheating, fueled by heated competition and pressure, is pervasive. Turnitin helps motivate students to produce more original, properly cited work—giving teachers a powerful opportunity to teach about plagiarism. Download our effectiveness whitepaper.

Turnitin User EventTurnitin User Event – Denver, Colorado

The Turnitin User Event will bring together users at a variety of experience levels and will provide an opportunity to learn and connect with each other as well as the Turnitin team. This free 2-hour meeting will feature:

  • panel discussions on best practices.
  • brief presentations by “power users” on user-chosen topics.
  • a sneak preview of our next-generation version of Turnitin.

This free event is scheduled for Sunday, June 27, 2010 (3-5 PM) in Denver, Colorado—the opening day of the ISTE Conference (formerly called NECC). If you are planning on attending ISTE or will be in the area, we want to hear from you! Please click here to fill out an interest form.

NewsBits

Singaporean Universities Choose Turnitin

Turnitin has been adopted by all four universities in Singapore. Turnitin is used across the universities’ curricula and is available to tens of thousands of educators and students at Nanyang Technological University (NTU), National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore Management University (SMU) and SIM University (UniSIM). Read more…

Identifying Potential Plagiarism In Translated Documents

iParadigms announced that it has licensed Language Weaver’s automated translation technology, enabling Turnitin to identify plagiarized content that has been translated from English into other languages. This capability will be incorporated into Turnitin by the end of 2010. Read more…

Scheduled Downtime

All Turnitin services and related websites may be unavailable for use during scheduled maintenance times. Times for these scheduled maintenance windows are the first and third Saturdays of each month, 7:00 AM to 11:00 AM Pacific time.

Events

Fourth International Plagiarism Conference

June 21 – 23, 2010
Northumbria University,
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
iParadigms is a proud sponsor of this event that brings together the international educational community to share their experiences, expertise, and advice in creating a culture of honesty.
http://www.plagiarismadvice.org/conference

Turnitin User Event @ ISTE

June 27, 2010 @ 3:00pm (MDT)
Hyatt Regency Denver
Denver, Colorado
The Turnitin User Event will bring together users of all experience levels and provide them with an opportunity to learn and connect with each other as well as the Turnitin team.
http://turnitinusereventdenver.eventbrite.com/

ISTE 2010

June 27-30, 2010
Denver, Colorado
Visit the Turnitin booth (#2066) at ISTE 2010 to get a first look at what’s coming for Turnitin. ISTE 2010 (formerly NECC) is the premiere event for education technology professionals worldwide.
http://center.uoregon.edu/ISTE/2010/


View the original Turnitin Newsletter for May 2010

Engaging Students with Turnitin

Engaging StudentsTurnitin’s tagline is, “Prevent Plagiarism. Engage Students.” We get a lot of comments via our Blog, Twitter, and through other outlets about how Turnitin engages students.

Instructors and students are most familiar with the Turnitin Originality Checking part of the service. The originality reports provide an opportunity for instructors to connect with students to show them proper citation, to identify motivations for improper citation, and to address academic integrity. In other words, it gives instructors a teaching moment.

The PeerMark peer review service allows students to evaluate and learn from one another’s work. PeerMark provides an opportunity for students to develop critical thinking and writing skills through collaboration.

The GradeMark paperless grading service empowers instructors to give students meaningful and legible feedback, not confined to red ink scrawled in the margins of a paper. By providing richer feedback, students can better apply that feedback to their writing.

With Turnitin, there are new opportunities to engage students, better ways to involve them in the writing process, better ways to help them internalize what they are taught. Learn more about engaging students through our WriteCycle Academy series of webinars. Sign up for a live webinar or download previously recorded sessions at:
http://turnitin.com/static/writecycle_academy.html

How do you engage your students with Turnitin? Share your story in the comments section.

Don’t have PeerMark or GradeMark activated yet? Talk to your Turnitin account administrator and let them know you want it!

Announcing Turnitin2 – Coming in September

Turnitin2 SchematicThanks to our customers’ suggestions and ideas, Turnitin will soon be better than ever. We are pleased to announce that in September 2010, we are launching a new version of our solution called Turnitin2 (previously announced as WriteCycle2).

For the first time, users will enjoy a solution with full integration of our three essential instructional support tools: OriginalityCheck plagiarism prevention, PeerMark peer reviewing and GradeMark paperless grading. This integration is a major step in providing a productivity-enhancing “all-in-one” perspective of students’ work.

With Turnitin2, you will:

  • Work with a single, “all-in-one” view of a student’s paper in its original format, including styled text, graphics and photos.
  • Save time and increase productivity with improved tools and a unified user interface.
  • View feedback from all sources in one comprehensive, multi-layered view.
  • Maintain academic integrity and engage students in their development as learners.

Current Turnitin and WriteCycle customers in English and Spanish will automatically experience the Turnitin2 improvements when they log in. Additional versions in our ten other supported languages are in development and will be announced as the dates become available.

Download the Turnitin2 Flyer for more details

Plagiarism Proofing Assignments with Turnitin WriteCycle

In our first blog “Does Turnitin Detect Plagiarism?” we said that Turnitin does not detect plagiarism but, rather, generates a similarity index indicating text matches to the Turnitin databases. Instructors and their students can use that information to determine if  there are issues with intentional or unintentional plagiarism. So, while Turnitin does not specifically “detect” plagiarism, instructors can work towards plagiarism proofing their written assignments by implementing Turnitin and WriteCycle tools in their courses using some well-documented best practices.

Research suggests that assignments can be made more difficult to plagiarize if instructors:

• Emphasize the recursiveness of writing.1
• Require significantly revised multiple drafts.1
• Break an assignment into parts that are to be turned in at different stages of the creation process: pre-writing, drafting, revising, reflecting.1

This idea of plagiarism proofing assignments makes sense, suggesting that students are less likely to leave the work to the last minute—when research and writing skills may deteriorate or students might be tempted to use writing that is not their own—if they are engaged in writing as a process.

However, this type of assignment set up can seem burdensome to instructors, especially for content-area instructors who may not have the time to collect, manage and grade multiple drafts or assignments from each stage of the writing process.
Instructors can engage students in process writing by asking students to provide feedback to one another through collaborative peer  assessment activities and by encouraging students to assess their own progress through reflective self-assessments, but instructors need a tool to facilitate this work. WriteCycle (the combination of Turnitin Originality Checking, PeerMark online peer reviewing and GradeMark digital feedback) is such an instructional support tool that can:

• Engage students in the process from the beginning stages of writing.
• Hold students accountable for developing awareness, skills and scholarship.
• Develop prewriting with substance as students collaborate and discuss writing topics.
• Offer opportunities for self-assessment through Revision and Reflection Assignments.

Assessing students’ prewriting, drafting, revising, and editing is a daunting task for instructors given the sheer volume of writing activities for even a small number of students. Turnitin WriteCycle aids instructor management of written assignments throughout the writing process as it …

• Provides a central location on the web for instructors to manage and view student work.
• Helps instructors monitor and assess student progress throughout the writing process.
• Offers students better feedback and more meaningful feedback from various sources, such as Turnitin’s Originality Report, PeerMark’s online, collaborative peer reviews.
• GradeMark’s QuickMarks and rubrics.

When students are engaged in writing tasks, they are less likely to plagiarize, and Turnitin WriteCycle asks students to actively participate in self-assessment, peer collaboration and process writing. Instructors can monitor student progress throughout the writing stages of prewriting, drafting, revision and editing but further ensure that students receive more feedback and better feedback on their written work. Thus, Turnitin WriteCycle is a tool that does not detect plagiarism, per se, but can help instructors—and students—prevent it.

1 Writing @CSU (1993-2010). Strategies for a writing classroom. Retrieved from http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/teaching/plagiarism/classroom.cfm